5th WCRI in Amsterdam
Invited conference papers, presentations, and biographies are available for download.
Docman 5WCRI Amsterdam - Papers and Presentations
-
default WCRI2017 Aaron MANKA Review of the National Science Foundations RCR policy and survey of instituation responses
-
default WCRI2017 Alison AVENELL Investigating the impact of retracted randomised clinical trial reports
-
default WCRI2017 Alison AVENELL Novel statistical investigation methods examining data integrity for 33 randomized trials in 18 journals from one research group
-
-
default WCRI2017 Ana MARUSIC Accountability and transparency for research integrity via country report cards
-
default WCRI2017 Ana MARUSIC HEIRRI project; Creating training programs for responsible research and innovation
-
default WCRI2017 Andrew GREY Reporting concerns about data integrity for 33 randomized trials in 18 journals from one research group
-
-
default WCRI2017 Annelieke ROEST Publishing negative trials on the efficacy of antidepressant medications in pooled trials publications
-
default WCRI2017 Asashima ICHIKAWA A large scale nation wide survey indicates that the government policy is important for promoting research ethics education among future researchers
-
-
default WCRI2017 Bernd PULVERER The transparant publishing, reprints & open science; The EMBO Press paradigm
-
default WCRI2017 Bert SEGHERS The research integrity landscape in Flanders (Belgium) Lessons learned on promoting integrity
-
default WCRI2017 Bertil ANDERSSON Research and research integrity a key priority for a young and fast rising university
-
default WCRI2017 Bianca KRAMER Research Integrity; catalyst and outcome of innovative research practices and tools
-
-
default WCRI2017 Brian MARTINSON Main outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to test reporting and feedback to foster research integrity
-
-
default WCRI2017 C K GUNSALES The value of a comparative benchmarking database for research integrity climates
-
default WCRI2017 Camilla NEBEKER Building Research Integrity & Capacity Bridging Research to Practice
-
default WCRI2017 Carel PEETERS Evaluating evidence for low data veracity from reported summary measures; A case study
-
default WCRI2017 Carol THRUSH Exploring cross cultural similarities, differences and collaborative interests in measuring organizational climate for research integrity
-
-
default WCRI2017 Catherins BENS Quality assurance A tool for Improving Research integrity and supporting a quality structure
-
default WCRI2017 Chet MCLESKEY Reviewing the responsible conduct of research (RCR) literature from a scientific virtue perspective
-
default WCRI2017 Chris GRAF Challenges facing journals in liaising with institutions on research integrity cases
-
default WCRI2017 Claudio SUNKEL From the individual to the collective responsibility on research integrity; A view from the directors office
-
default WCRI2017 Clemens FESTEN From scanning phd theses for plagiarism to awareness how to cite references
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Danny CHAN Asian and Pacific Rim Research Integrity Network; Increasing accountability and transparency
-
default WCRI2017 David MOHER What do we know about potential predatory journals and the articles they publish
-
-
default WCRI2017 Dena PLEMMONS Authors without borders; Investigating international authorship norms among scientists & engineers
-
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Els MAECKELBERGHE Exporing the fun in science; A prerequisite for succesful RCR courses
-
default WCRI2017 Eric BERLING A virtue based responsible conduct of research (RCR) curriculum; Pilot test results
-
default WCRI2017 Erika LOFSTROM Conceptual definition and empirical investigation of ethics in doctoral supervision
-
default WCRI2017 Erin SLATTENGREN Applying Insights from the Field of bahavioural economics to the Institutional Management of Research Integrity
-
default WCRI2017 Espen ENGH Country report card on research integrity Norway a broad approach to research integrity
-
default WCRI2017 Estelle DUMAS MALLET Replication validity of biomedical findings reported by newspapers
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Frederick LEUNG A survey to analyse the attitude and knowledge on research integrity among first and second year research postgraduate students in KHU
-
-
default WCRI2017 H T QUACH HOANG Ensuring research integrity during data collection in a closed context the case of Vietnam
-
default WCRI2017 Hans LUND The need for research methods and processes to be evidence based when performing research
-
-
default WCRI2017 Iain CHALMERS Reducing waste from inappropriate ethics analysis and hyper regulation of research
-
-
default WCRI2017 Ian FRECKELTON Research misconduct and the law Intervening to name, shame and deter
-
default WCRI2017 Iina KOHONEN Public Science Communication as a part of the responsible conduct of research
-
default WCRI2017 In Jae LEE Changes of research ethics consciousness of research in Korea following Hwangs Scandal
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Jadranka STOJANOVSKI COST action new frontiers of peer review (PEERE) Many shades of journal publishing; What color is peer review in a predatory journal
-
-
default WCRI2017 Jane JACOBS Publishing and research ethics as a wicked problem; New thinking and new approaches to making research more accountable and transparent
-
default WCRI2017 Jay WALSH How people learn The Pernicious Impact of doing Wrong or just Getting It Wrong and What Institutions can do about it
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Jillian BARR Promoting research integrity in Australia; A funding agency perspective
-
default WCRI2017 Jim VANDER PUTTEN Presentation and publication patterns in international vanity conferences in education; Research on research quality
-
-
default WCRI2017 John THOMAS The parallel tracks of legal accountability for research misconduct in the United States
-
default WCRI2017 Jojanneke BASTIAANSEN The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments; the case of depression
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Karolyn WHITE The Australian better practice guide for managing and investiging research misconduct; the challenge of the new
-
-
default WCRI2017 Ksenija BAZDARIC Plagiarism detection during submission in thee Croation biomedical journals
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Loreta TAUGINIENĖ Redundant publications and self plagiarism in Lithuanian academia
-
default WCRI2017 Lyn HORN An investigation of researchers' understanding and experience of scientific authorship in South Africa
-
-
default WCRI2017 Marion SCHMIDT An in depth analysis of the annotation of retractions in PubMed and Web of Science
-
default WCRI2017 Maro MALICKI How are journals handling third party inquiries of possible duplicate publications
-
default WCRI2017 Marwan FELAEFEL A cross sectional survey study to assess prevalence and attitues regarding research misconduct among investigators in the Middle East
-
-
default WCRI2017 Matt WESTMORE The UK NIHRs 'Adding Value in Research' program; Lessons from 6 years of improvement
-
default WCRI2017 Matthias KAISER Cutting corners, speeding, cheating and heavy legal machinery in science
-
default WCRI2017 Matthias KAISER The unfortunate mingling of ethics and law in cases of scientific integrity
-
default WCRI2017 Maura HINEY Efforts to harmonise codes of conduct for RI in Europe Drivers, approaches and challenges in a multi system context
-
default WCRI2017 Michael GOMMEL Young researcher know misconduct, but they don't know how to deal with it
-
-
default WCRI2017 Michael REISIG Perceptions of research misconduct among faculty members at Americas top 100 universities; Preliminary results from a large survey based project
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Mohammed HOSSEINI A philosophical framework for a morally legitimate definition of scientific authorship
-
-
default WCRI2017 Nathalie VORIANO What is 'responsible conduct of researchs' in research creation A survey of Canadian Researchers
-
-
default WCRI2017 Nicholas STENECK Improving transparency and accountability of RI training The Epigeum Impact Programme
-
-
default WCRi2017 Noémie AUBERT BONN Research on research integrity; publishing patterns, trends and impact
-
-
default WCRI2017 P KAVOURAS EARTHnet; an initiative to promote a Research Integrity Framework in Greece
-
default WCRI2017 Patricia HENLEY Integrating transparency into a university quality management system
-
-
default WCRI2017 Patrick BOSSUYT How reporting guidelines can help to improve practice; the story of STARD
-
default WCRI2017 Patrick BOSSUYT What are academic instituations doing to reduce waste and increase value in research, and what could they do
-
default WCRI2017 Paul GLASZIOU The potential use of text mining and automated tools to monitor & reduce waste and improve integrity
-
default WCRI2017 Paul TAYLOR Callenges facing institutions in liasing with journals on research integrity cases
-
default WCRI2017 Paul TAYLOR Moments of integrity, reflexivity and the fraud triangle; A new way to approach improving research culture
-
default WCRI2017 Ping SUN Coordinating resources to make online research integrity and ethicsrelated information available to everyone who demand it
-
default WCRI2017 Priya SATALKAR Researcher perspectives on raising concerns; First results from the PRISM project
-
default WCRI2017 Rachel HENDRICK Managing or maintaining bias; Examining the instituationalisation of conflicts of interest in medical journal publishing
-
default WCRI2017 Raju TAMOT The U S biomedical and life sciences field and research misconduct; Insights from an analysis of closed U S office of Research Integrity case files
-
default WCRI2017 Rebecca DAVIES Incorporating Research Quality Assurance into MD PhD and PhD Research Training
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Serge HORBACH Promoting virtue or punishing fraud; Contrasting discourses on scientific integrity and ways to obtain it
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Skip GARNER Introduction to research integrity and the law; Finding potential grant double dippers
-
default WCRI2017 Stephan LEWANDOWSKY Being open but not naked; balancing transparancy with resilience in science
-
default WCRI2017 Susan O'BRIEN When things go wrong; A systematic approach to determining the integrity of multiple publications
-
-
default WCRI2017 Sven HENDRIX Both whistle blowers and the scientists they accuse deserve protection
-
default WCRI2017 Takehito KAMATA The development of research culture in Japanese public science; Academic responses to policy reforms
-
default WCRI2017 Thomas STECKLER Consorted approaches to facilitate data quality, robustness and relevance in preclinical research and development
-
-
default WCRI2017 Tom VAN DE CASTEELE Connecting statisticians and scientists; Statistical awareness training as a key tool to ensure research integrity
-
default WCRI2017 Tony PEATFIELD Shaping tomorrows research integrity; Policies and processes in European research funding organisations and research performing organisations
-
-
default WCRI2017 Trisha PHILLIPS Research Integrity and professional codes of ethics; A qualitive comparison across social sciences
-
default WCRI2017 Trisha PHILLIPS Transparency and accountability in internationally sponsored political science research
-
default WCRI2017 V GICHURU Enhancing the research culture at strathmore university amongst PHD faculty members
-
default WCRI2017 Virginia BARBOUR How could editors think differently about the complexities of research and publishing ethics
-
-
-
default WCRI2017 Zoe HAMMATT Accountability and transparency for research integrity via country report cards
-
default WCRI2017 Zubin MASTER Safeguarding the biomedical research environment; Ethical responsibilities of research instituations and funders
-
default WCRI2017 Zubin MASTER The perceptions of researchers working in multidisciplinary teams on authorship and publication ethics
