6th WCRI in Hong Kong
Invited conference papers and presentations are available for download.
Docman 6WCRI Hong Kong - Papers and Presentations
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Alison AVENELL Examining the impact of research misconduct, and delays to its correction, on vitamin K reviews and guidelines
-
default WCRI2019 Ana JERONCIC History of scientific publishing requirements a systematic review and meta analyses of studies analysing instructions to author
-
default WCRI2019 Andrew GREY Responses of institutions to wideranging concerns about research reported by a group of researchers with multiple retracted publications
-
-
default WCRI2019 Anni SAIRIO Investigating Responsible Research in Finland Research Integrity Barometer 2018 and the Surveys of (In)appropriate Feedback
-
default WCRI2019 Armin SCHMOLMUELLER Recognition of the precarious academic self Notes toward a performative virtue approach in professional RI training and its practical implic
-
-
default WCRI2019 Boosaree TITAPIWATANAKU Opinion towards Research Integrity from researchers in Thailand
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Charon PIERSON Panel discussion promoting best practices for responsible authorship
-
default WCRI2019 Chet MCLESKEY The Humanities Virtues Project Bringing a Virtue‐based Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research Training to the Humanities
-
default WCRI2019 Chien CHOU Perception of Research Integrity on Taiwan University Campuses A Comparison of Administrators, Faculties, and Students
-
default WCRi2019 Christian SIMON Deliberating serious research misconduct at institutions where the misconduct occurred
-
default WCRI2019 Christopher HUNTER Data curation as a means to promote reproducibility and discoverability
-
default WCRI2019 Daniel BARR Research integrity around the Pacific Rim Developing the APEC Taylor Guiding Principles for Research Integrity
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Daniel PIZZOLATO Mapping and assessing online free available research integrity educational resources
-
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Debora WEBER WULFF A Breakdown in Communication Journal Reactions to Information about Plagiarism and Duplicate
-
-
default WCRI2019 Deyanira Duque ORTIZ The Colombian Experience in the Design of a Policy on Ethics of Research, Bioethics, and Scientific Integrity
-
default WCRI2019 Dirnagl ULRICH The Quest Center in Berlin A laboratory for behaviour change in academic biomedicine
-
-
default WCRI2019 Dorota GOBLE Ensuring Value in Research International Funders’ Ensuring Value in Research International Funders’
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Geziena Cynthia FEKKEN Sharing Information on the Responsible Conduct of Research A Canadian Perspective
-
default WCRI2019 Giulia INGUAGGIATO Developing a face to face train the trainers program for fostering virtues in research integrity
-
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Harold GARNER Identifying and quantifying the level of questionable abstract publications at scientific meetings
-
default WCRI2019 Heather TIERNEY Preprints and Ethics Thoughts from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
-
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Hjordis CZESNICK Supporting researchers in cases of conflict How ombudspersons contribute to the prevention of scientific misconduct
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Jennifer BYRNE Semi automated fact checking of nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical research publications the Seek & Blastn tool
-
-
default WCRI2019 Jesper SCHNEIDER Perceptions and prevalence of questionable research practices across all fields of research Findings from a large scale multinational
-
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Joanna JOHNSON A missing component of research integrity pedagogy expanding RCR education to include writing scientific prose
-
default WCRI2019 Jochem ZUJIDERWIJK The Evaluative Breach How research staff deal with a challenge of evaluative norms in a Dutch biomedical research institute
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Johannes HJELLBREKKE Research Integrity in Norway (RINO) The Murky Waters of QRP Attitudes and Self‐Reported QRPs
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Jos KOLE Personalising impersonal science Narrative‐ethical analysis of some authorship cases
-
-
default WCRI2019 Julia PRIESS BUCHHEIT Rotatory role playing and role models to enhance the research integrity culture
-
pdf WCRI2019 Kwanchanok YIMTAE Fostering research integrity and social relevance of research findings an experience from Thailand
-
default WCRI2019 Liapeng MATSAU An analysis of retracted articles with African authors or coauthors Possible implications for training and awareness raising
-
default WCRI2019 Lisa WINSTANLEY Reviewing the Prevalence of Visual Plagiarism Within Visual Arts, Tertiary Education in South East Asia
-
default WCRI2019 Lydia LIESEGANG The Impact of Published Incorrect Scientific Information on the Knowledge Production of Scientific Communities
-
default WCRI2019 Lyn HORN Ethical constraints to open data in a [South] African Health Research context
-
-
default WCRI2019 Mariana RIBIERO The views of a group of funders reviewers about the influence of retractions in the evaluation of grant proposals
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Mario MALICKI Transparency and Openness in Research a Survey Among Researchers, Peer Reviewers and Editors Across Scientific Disciplines
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Matthias KAISER The perceived FFP‐QRP hierarchy results from a large‐scale survey among Norwegian researchers
-
-
default WCRI2019 Michael GOMMEL Back to Basics Can Early Communication about Good Scientific Practice Help Prevent Misconduct
-
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Michael KHOR Global Trends in Research Integrity and Research Ethics Analysed through Bibliometrics Analysis of Publications
-
default WCRI2019 Michael REISIG The Perceieved Prevalence, Cause, and Prevention of Research Misconduct
-
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Michele LEDUC Open science for publications and data Chances and risks for research integrity
-
-
default WCRI2019 Miriam URLINGS Selective citation in biomedical sciences an overview of six research fields
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Nathalie PERCIE DU SERT Use and impact of the ARRIVE guidelines A survey of in vivo researchers worldwide
-
pdf WCRI2019 Nicholas STENECK The use of embedded poll questions as a tool for assessing research integrity training and climate
-
default WCRI2019 Nick ALLUM The relationship of questionable research practices and how researchers perceive their working conditions
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Noah VAN DONGEN Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios
-
default WCRI2019 Nomar ALVIAR Values based learning modules on responsible conduct of research in undergraduate medical education
-
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Peta ASHWORTH Fostering research integrity and social relevance of research findings The Australian context
-
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Raymond DE VRIES Research integrity and research ethics Mapping overlapping jurisdictions
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Renee HOCH Impact of data availability on resolution of post publication image concern cases
-
default WCRI2019 Rick ANDERSON Predators at the Gates Citations to Predatory Journals in Mainstream Scientific Literature
-
pdf WCRI2019 Rien JANSSENS Balancing roles and responsibilities a qualitative study on experiences and perspectives of members of a Dutch Medical Research Ethics Committee
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Sergey KONOVALOV Research ethics in Russia challenges for the Russian Science Foundation
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Sonja OCHSENFELD REPP Revision of the DFG`s White Paper “Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice”
-
default WCRI2019 Sophia Jui An PAN Taiwanese and US graduate students’ alternative concepts of responsible conduct of research
-
default WCRI2019 Soren HOLM Research misconduct in non empirical research – are there types of misconduct analogous to fabrication and falsification
-
default WCRI2019 Sudarat LUEPONGPATTANA Research Quality Development of the Thailand National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA)
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Tetsuji ISEDA Possibility of redefining fabrication and falsification in the humanities
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Tobias GRIMM Best practice in assessing Research Excellence by Public Research Funders
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Torkild VINTHER ENRIO Handbook Recommendations for the investigation of Research Misconduct
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Twan HUYBERS The ‘Singapore Statement on Research Integrity’ and researchers’ perceptions of responsible research conduct
-
default WCRI2019 Ulf TOELCH Educational interventions support adoption of reproducible research practices
-
default WCRI2019 Ulrike FELT Implementing a culture of integrity Styles in governing research integrity in university environments
-
default WCRI2019 Vasiliy VLASSOV Research misconduct in dissertations and scientific publications in Russia
-
-
-
-
default WCRI2019 Yandong ZHAO Academic Capitalism, Managerialization, and the Change of Attitude towards Scientific Misconduct
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Yusuf ALI Effectiveness of data auditing as a tool to reinforce good Research Data Management practice
-
-
pdf WCRI2019 Edwin WERE Self‐ reported Occurrence and Correlates of Research Misconduct among HIV Researchers in Kenya
